The USS Nimitz “Tic Tac” Encounter — Off Southern California (2004)

Infrared still from the FLIR1 Navy video showing a small object in a targeting-pod display
Historical case When: November 14, 2004  ·  Where: Pacific Ocean, off southern California (approximate)

Status: Corroborated — multiple Navy personnel, radar and an official video; the Pentagon calls the object “unidentified.” Explanations such as sensor artifacts and drones have been proposed.

FLIR1 — official Department of Defense video of the November 2004 encounter, released 2020. Video: U.S. Navy via DVIDS.
Credit: U.S. Navy / Department of Defense (via DVIDS, video ID 955825) · Licence: Public domain (U.S. government work) · Source

On November 14, 2004, Cmdr. David Fravor of the USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group, flying a Boeing F/A-18 Super Hornet, investigated radar indications of a possible target off the coast of southern California. He said the cruiser USS Princeton had been tracking unusual aircraft for about two weeks before. Fravor reported a white, oval object hovering above a disturbance in the ocean and estimated it at 40 feet long. Four aircrew in two jets watched it for about five minutes. As he spiraled down to get closer, the object ascended and mirrored his path before disappearing.

A second flight, which included weapons systems officer Lt. Cmdr. Chad Underwood, was equipped with an infrared camera. Underwood recorded the video known as “FLIR1” and coined the name “Tic Tac” for the image. He did not see the object with his own eyes. Radar and combat-system technicians have since said the strike group had tracked similar contacts for about a week.

The video leaked in 2007 and was published by The New York Times in December 2017. The Department of Defense said in 2020 it was releasing it to clear up misconceptions, and the objects in it remain characterized as “unidentified.” Possible explanations offered include drones, camera artifacts and misinterpretation.

Sources: Wikipedia: Pentagon UFO videos · DVIDS: FLIR1 — UAP

Historical case. This is a summary written by the Department from the published sources listed above, in our own words. It is a historical case added to the map for context, not a reader submission. Reports are claims or findings as described in those sources; they are not proof of anything, and where an official or widely accepted explanation exists we say so. For entertainment and curiosity only. Spotted a mistake, or know more? Add a verification note below, or email paranormaldepartment1@gmail.com.

📍 See this case on the map. Were you nearby, or can you explain it? Add a verification note below — notes are read by a person before they appear.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *